New Powers to Tackle Anti-Social Behaviour Are Welcome – But Evidence Remains the Biggest Challenge
- SIASS OPERATORS

- Jul 29
- 3 min read
The introduction of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 represents one of the most significant developments in the fight against anti-social behaviour (ASB) in recent years. With the introduction of new Respect Orders and strengthened enforcement powers, local authorities, housing providers and community safety partners have been given additional tools to protect communities from persistent nuisance and disorder.
For organisations responsible for managing neighbourhoods, these changes to powers which tackle anti-social behaviour are undoubtedly welcome. They recognise the impact that anti-social behaviour has not only on victims, but also on wider communities, local services and public confidence.
However, whilst stronger legislation provides greater enforcement powers, one critical challenge remains unchanged.
Without credible evidence, even the strongest legal powers are difficult to use effectively.

The Challenge Facing Housing Providers and Local Authorities
Every day, housing officers, neighbourhood teams and community safety professionals receive reports of anti-social behaviour ranging from persistent noise nuisance and intimidation through to harassment, criminal damage, drug-related activity and breaches of tenancy agreements.
Many of these reports are genuine and have a significant impact on residents' quality of life. Yet taking formal enforcement action is rarely straightforward.
Officers often hear phrases such as:
"Everyone knows who is responsible."
"It's been happening for months."
"The neighbours are too frightened to make statements."
"We know what's happening, but we can't prove it."
This is where investigations frequently reach an impasse.
Rumour, suspicion and community intelligence are valuable in directing enquiries, but they are rarely sufficient to support enforcement action on their own.
The Importance of Evidence To Tackle Anti-Social Behaviour
Whether seeking a Respect Order, enforcing tenancy conditions, supporting possession proceedings or assisting criminal investigations, decision-makers must be able to demonstrate that their actions are based upon reliable evidence.
That evidence may include:
Witness statements
CCTV footage
Body-worn video
Incident logs
Digital evidence
Professional observations
The stronger and more objective the evidence, the greater the confidence organisations can have when progressing formal action.
Importantly, good evidence also protects organisations themselves by demonstrating that investigations have been conducted fairly, professionally and in accordance with legal requirements.
Why Victims Often Cannot Provide the Evidence Needed
One of the greatest frustrations for housing providers is that those most affected by anti-social behaviour are often the least able to provide the evidence required.
Victims may be reluctant to:
Make formal complaints.
Provide witness statements.
Attend court.
Be identified by those responsible.
Continue reporting incidents over prolonged periods.
Fear of retaliation is a very real concern in many communities.
As a result, organisations are often left with multiple complaints but limited independent evidence capable of supporting enforcement.
Professional Surveillance as Part of an Investigation
Professional surveillance is not a substitute for good neighbourhood management, nor should it be the first response to every report of anti-social behaviour.
However, where repeated complaints exist and conventional methods have been exhausted, carefully planned surveillance can provide objective evidence that assists decision-makers.
When deployed lawfully and proportionately, surveillance may help establish:
Patterns of behaviour.
Repeated breaches of tenancy agreements.
Individuals responsible for ongoing incidents.
Times and locations of persistent nuisance.
Corroborating evidence to support existing complaints.
Perhaps most importantly, professionally obtained evidence provides independent verification of events rather than relying solely upon conflicting accounts from residents.
Acting Proportionately and Legally
Surveillance is rightly subject to strict legal and ethical considerations.
Every investigation should be planned with clear objectives, appropriate risk assessments and careful consideration of privacy, proportionality and data protection requirements.
Organisations should expect any professional surveillance provider to operate within the law, maintain comprehensive audit trails and produce evidence capable of withstanding scrutiny should legal proceedings follow.
Stronger Powers Need Stronger Evidence
The Crime and Policing Act provides housing providers, councils and community safety partners with greater opportunities to tackle persistent anti-social behaviour.
Yet legislation alone cannot solve the problem.
Successful enforcement still depends upon the quality of the evidence available.
Organisations that invest in robust investigation processes, professional evidence gathering and lawful surveillance where appropriate are likely to be in the strongest position to protect their communities, support victims and take decisive action against those responsible.
About SIASS
At SIASS, we support housing associations, local authorities, solicitors, businesses and private clients by providing professional, discreet and legally compliant surveillance and investigation services throughout the UK.
We understand that every case is different. Our role is not simply to observe, but to help clients obtain clear, objective evidence that supports informed decision-making and, where appropriate, legal or regulatory action.
If your organisation is facing persistent anti-social behaviour and would like to discuss how professional surveillance could support your existing investigation, we would be pleased to have a confidential, no-obligation conversation.




Comments